Press "Enter" to skip to content

Enduring the System: A Teacher’s Guide to Survival in American Public Schools / Edward Allen

01.05.2025

Enduring the System: A Teacher’s Guide to Survival in American Public Schools

1. Understand the System

The U.S. public education system—especially in underfunded districts—is not designed to cultivate a nurturing or supportive learning environment. Instead, it fragments key stakeholders: elected officials, district administrators, school administrators, teachers, parents, and private education companies. Each operates in survival mode, creating a culture that discourages authenticity, sincerity, collaboration, and solidarity.

2. Professional Development (PD) Days Are Performative

PD days primarily serve as a tool for district and school administrators to justify their roles rather than to address real classroom challenges. In struggling districts, administrators deliberately avoid engaging with urgent, organic issues. Instead, they present contrived scenarios and superficial solutions to maintain an illusion of effectiveness.

3. PD Surveys Are Compliance Tools

Post-PD surveys are not intended for genuine feedback but to measure compliance. These surveys are structured to elicit positive responses, leaving no room for real critique. The safest approach is to respond as if you found the PD session highly effective, regardless of its actual value. Attempting to challenge or outsmart the system is futile.

4. Teacher Evaluations Are a Power Play

Teacher evaluations can be manipulative and demoralizing. During pre- and post-observation meetings, it is advisable to make administrators feel competent and valued. Even if their feedback is superficial and unhelpful, presenting yourself as eager for their guidance can minimize conflict and reduce stress. Not all, but most administrators come from a background of poor teaching practice.

5. The System Prioritizes Optics Over Outcomes

In underfunded districts, education is largely performative. Government officials, education departments, district leaders, and administrators do not genuinely expect high academic achievement from students living in poverty. Their primary focus is maintaining appearances rather than addressing systemic inequities. If you genuinely challenge injustice and inequality at school, you are essentially swimming against the current and should expect administrative pushback and retaliation.

6. Most Administrators Were Ineffective Teachers

Many administrators transitioned out of teaching because they struggled in the classroom. Do not assume they were once great educators with strong pedagogical skills, a deep understanding of education, or a commitment to justice and fairness. Their primary role is public relations—promoting policies and initiatives, regardless of their personal beliefs. Many are insecure and thrive on hierarchical power dynamics. To avoid unnecessary conflict, make them feel superior.

7. Teaching in Poor Schools Will Change You

Even if you enter the profession as a passionate and intellectual educator, teaching in underfunded schools can be disillusioning. Systemic dysfunction, hypocrisy, and superficiality dominate these environments. Over time, you may realize that meaningful change is nearly impossible, leading many teachers to become passive, disengaged, and resigned to their roles as glorified babysitters.

8. Unspoken Rules Matter More Than Official Policies

In struggling schools, unwritten rules often carry more weight than official policies. Understanding them quickly is crucial. For instance, there is often an unspoken expectation that no more than 20% of students in a class should fail. Exceeding this threshold can lead to administrative scrutiny, job insecurity, and professional isolation.
Similarly, no matter the level of student misbehavior or disruption, if you send students to the office more than once a week, you risk being placed on an unofficial “troublemaker” list. It is often safer to find ways to manage difficult students within the classroom.
At the end of the day, you are often seen not as an educator but as a glorified babysitter.

9. Superficiality is the Norm

In underfunded schools and districts, when something goes wrong, never expect the issue to be handled with care, honesty, professionalism, ethics, or justice. Always remember: no matter how strong your case is, as a teacher you will likely be the first to be blamed, punished, or discarded. If you choose to defend yourself and escalate the issue, prepare for serious and repeated challenges and retaliations. Support will be scarce; competent teachers and staff rarely stay long in struggling schools. Most of the staff lack of principle and character and courage: they cannot sustain a thoughtful and argument-based conversation longer than five minutes. They can easily be manipulated and used by admin. Sad, but true.

10. Despite It All: Choosing Authenticity

Despite all the realities outlined above, if you continue to teach in poor schools and strive to remain an authentic, caring, and intellectually engaged teacher, you face a constant struggle.
It is a daily choice to stand on the side of emancipation and liberation, rather than become a cog in the machine of oppression.

Edward Allen
May 1, 2025 / California

Loading

Open Letter to the President / Edward Allen

19.02.2025

Open Letter to the President

Dear Mr. President,

As a public educator with 30 years of experience across multiple states, primarily in underfunded school districts, I have deep concerns about your recent statement regarding the elimination of the Department of Education. Your argument—that the U.S. spends the most per student but ranks low in success, while Norway and other Scandinavian countries excel—was both misleading and oversimplified.

While it is true that the U.S. has a high average expenditure per student, this statistic masks a deep inequity. Due to the link between local taxation and school funding, affluent districts receive the lion’s share of resources, while poor districts struggle with inadequate funding. When comparing student performance in well-funded U.S. districts to that of Norway, the outcomes are comparable. The real crisis lies in the systemic neglect of poor school districts, where collapsing infrastructure, underpaid teachers, and bureaucratic inefficiencies perpetuate educational disparity.

The U.S. education system, shaped by policymakers from privileged backgrounds, disproportionately benefits the wealthy while leaving the disadvantaged behind. Much of the funding allocated to struggling districts is funneled into private educational corporations—such as textbook and standardized testing companies—rather than directly benefiting students and teachers. Additionally, administrative overhead consumes a significant portion of the budget, often rewarding bureaucrats who have little understanding of or investment in the realities of the classroom.

Before invoking Norway as a model, it is crucial to understand its approach. As a social democracy, Norway views education as a societal investment. Public schools are equitably funded, ensuring that all students receive a high-quality education regardless of socioeconomic background. Teachers are respected professionals, required to hold a master’s degree with a research component. They enjoy academic freedom and autonomy, which fosters a genuine profession rather than a survival-based occupation.

Conversely, the U.S. prioritizes economic efficiency over educational integrity. Success is measured through standardized testing, reducing learning to quantifiable metrics rather than fostering critical thinking and citizenship. High school diplomas in low-income districts often carry little value, as graduation requirements prioritize attendance over academic competence. Teacher preparation programs in the U.S. are often weak, allowing underqualified individuals to enter schools as teacher and admin in struggling districts, exacerbating the problem.

You and your family have not attended public schools, nor will you in the future. Citing Norway’s system without acknowledging its foundational social policies is disingenuous. The reality is that public education in the U.S. is divided into two worlds: in affluent areas, schools are well-resourced, safe, and stable; in poor districts, high turnover among teachers and administrators, discipline issues, and systemic neglect create an environment where education is devalued. Parents, who must work in a couple of different jobs just to get by, do not have time and energy to get involved in their children’s education. Many students in these districts understand, even implicitly, that the system has little to offer them.

Norway’s success stems from valuing education as a collective investment rather than a business venture. Schools function as communities, not profit-driven enterprises. Teachers are empowered, students are supported, and socioeconomic disparities are minimized. The U.S., particularly in impoverished districts, treats education like a commodity, with success dictated by corporate-driven metrics and economic return.

Instead of dismantling the Department of Education, I urge you to reconsider its role. Address the inequities in funding, invest in teacher development, and foster a sense of educational community. Education should not be a privilege for the wealthy but a right for all.

Sincerely,
Edward Allen / California, 2025

Loading

A day of a public educator in a poor school / Edward Allen

26.12.2024

A day of a public educator in a poor school

You wake up on a Monday morning, already thinking about the challenges the day might bring. Arriving at school before the students, you prepare the materials for the day and unlock the door to your classroom…

As the kids shuffle in, their moods are as varied as the weather—some still groggy, while others are bursting with energy. The bell rings, signaling it’s time to begin the lesson. But teaching in an overcrowded classroom in poor districts comes with its own set of hurdles. The noise never quite settles, and the students are far from ready to engage. Some show no interest in learning, while others don’t even bring the basics: no paper, pencils, or notebooks. You need to provide these materials daily that will help them to develop a sense of responsibility?

You raise your voice to cut through side conversations, trying to redirect attention. But when you scan the room, you notice only a handful of students have opened their notebooks or seem even slightly engaged. The rest are distracted or indifferent.

Adding to the chaos, students continue trickling in late—30 or 40 minutes into the period. Each new arrival disrupts the fragile rhythm of teaching and learning. Many students are off task, glued to their smartphones or engaging in disruptive behavior. To them, school feels like just another meaningless chore…

The restroom becomes a haven for students seeking to escape class. They disappear for 30 or 40 minutes at a time, gathering there to smoke, chat, and hang out. For some, the restroom is a far more appealing space than the classroom.

As you prepare to transition to another activity in class, chaos breaks out. Two students begin yelling or throwing things at each other, immediately diverting attentions, and creating an environment that’s anything but conducive to learning… some students leave the class without permission some still come in without any pass or excuse…

You call the office for help, and if you’re lucky, a member of the admin team shows up to remove the disruptive students. But you know how this story ends—within 10 minutes, those same students are back in class, facing no real consequences for their actions. Filing a disciplinary report would only inflate the school’s discipline data, something administrators are keen to avoid. But you often here them saying “we are a community with a shared motivation and goal” … Really? I am Not sure… it is hard to believe that we are a community.

Between classes, you face another challenge—finding a restroom. Teachers are human, too, but with only five minutes between periods, it’s a race. The staff restroom is far from your classroom and often occupied. If you attempt to use the student restroom, it’s either locked, out of order, or filled with students smoking and socializing.

During your prep time, walking to printing room, you see groups of students wondering around… they just wonder around with a golden pass; no rules apply them… sometimes you see deans of students, or a member of the admin team begs kids to go to their class which makes you questions where you are and what you are doing here!

This routine repeat period after period, and finally, the day comes to an end. But there’s little relief. You may have a staff meeting, professional development, or a collaboration session after school where teachers’ voices are suppressed and a set of irrelevant narratives, information’s, agendas are top-down imposed.

When you finally head to the parking lot, the weight of the day’s stress feels suffocating. Your energy is drained, and your spirit feels depleted. Another day has ended, but you know tomorrow will bring the same challenges… Some images of YouTube videos you watched recently cross your mind; public school teachers who recently quitted their job say that teaching in poor schools is no more than “a glorified baby seating job… everything else is just a deception and decoration” … Could they be right?

Having worked in schools across three major states in the U.S., I’ve come to realize that if you want to understand a society—its values, struggles, and priorities—there’s no better place to look than its public schools.

To be continued…

Edward Allen
Public Educator / California, 2024

Loading

Copyright © 2020 | Design & Development Serdar Kurtoğlu